Bumalik sa lahat ng templates
Artifact ng Prova
AI Workflow Audit Template para sa Marketing Teams
I-map ang isang marketing workflow at magdesisyon kung ano ang dapat i-automate, i-augment, protektahan, o tanggihan ng AI bago mag-commit ang team sa pilot.
Mga field ng template
- Workflow stage
- What AI handles today
- What AI should handle in six months
- What stays human and why
- Ethical or operational risk: low, medium, high
- Action: automate, augment, protect, decline
- ICE score for pilot candidates
Halimbawang may laman
Nasa English ang filled examples sa ibaba dahil English ang artifact review sa Prova.
Client reporting workflow for a paid media account.
Data extraction from ad platforms
Metric reconciliation
Anomaly detection
Insight drafting
Strategist review
Client-ready narrative
Follow-up action list
Mahinang version vs matibay na version
Mahinang version
| Workflow stage | Reporting |
|---|---|
| AI handles today | AI writes reports |
| Stays human | Strategy |
| Risk | Medium |
| Action | Automate |
Bakit ito pumapalya
- "Reporting" is too broad to audit.
- "Strategy" does not name the judgment point.
- It does not identify source systems, reconciliation risk, or who approves the client-facing narrative.
- Automating the whole workflow is unsafe because the work includes interpretation and client trust.
Matibay na version
| Workflow stage | Weekly paid media variance explanation for Meta, Google, and LinkedIn |
|---|---|
| AI handles today | Drafts first-pass variance notes from exported spend, revenue, CPA, and campaign-change logs |
| AI should handle in six months | Flags likely causes, drafts three audience-specific summaries, and proposes follow-up checks |
| Stays human | Strategist approves causal claims and client recommendation because platform data can be delayed or misleading |
| Risk | High for client narrative, medium for internal diagnosis |
| Action | Augment, with protected human approval before client send |
Bakit ito gumagana
- The stage is specific.
- Source systems are named.
- The human judgment point is explicit.
- Risk differs by use case.
- The action is narrow enough to pilot.
Ang nirereview ng Prova na madalas nalalampasan ng generic AI
- Whether the workflow scope is specific enough to audit
- Whether "stays human" reasons are concrete or just polite language
- Whether high-risk stages are incorrectly classified as automate
- Whether ICE scores are supported by operational reality
- Whether the selected pilot is narrow enough to test
- Whether the next sprint should be measurement, rollout, or foundation repair
Susunod na hakbang
Gusto mo ng feedback sa version mo? Nagsisimula ang Prova sa maikling assessment para tumugma ang review standard sa role, goal, at unang audience mo. Pagkatapos, papasok ka sa sprint na bagay sa ginagawa mo ngayon.
Sa ngayon, English lang ang Prova.
Bago mag-submit: alisin ang client names, confidential numbers, at anumang ayaw ninyong ma-store sa training o coaching system.
Magpatuloy sa Prova sa English