すべてのテンプレートに戻る
Provaの成果物
マーケティングチーム向けAI Readiness Scorecard
AI workflowを責任ある形でpilotするために、チームにsignal、data、運用リズム、明文化された判断基準があるかを評価します。
テンプレート項目
- Readiness item
- What 4+ looks like
- Current score from 1-5
- Evidence
- Gap
- Owner
- Next 30-day fix
記入例
下の記入例は英語のままにしています。Provaでは提出された成果物を英語でレビューするためです。
An in-house growth team preparing to pilot AI-supported reporting and campaign recommendations.
First-party conversion signals are reliable
First-party data strategy is in place
AI-native campaign types are understood and operational
Paid, owned, and earned are planned as one system
Emerging channels are considered deliberately
Primary KPIs are separated from optimization metrics
Campaign data is clean, labeled, and queryable
Planning principles and brand guides are codified for AI use
弱い例と強い例
弱い例
| Item | Data is clean |
|---|---|
| Score | 4 |
| Evidence | We have dashboards |
| Gap | Some naming issues |
| Owner | Analytics |
| Next fix | Improve tracking |
なぜ弱いのか
- The score is unsupported.
- Dashboards do not prove the data is queryable or trustworthy.
- "Some naming issues" hides the operational impact.
- The owner is a department, not a person or role.
- "Improve tracking" is not a 30-day fix.
強い例
| Item | Campaign data is clean, labeled, and queryable |
|---|---|
| Score | 2 |
| Evidence | Google Ads and Meta naming conventions differ; LinkedIn uses old campaign taxonomy; weekly report still relies on manual spreadsheet cleanup |
| Gap | AI cannot compare cross-platform performance without manual reconciliation |
| Owner | Marketing analytics lead with paid media lead as reviewer |
| Next 30-day fix | Standardize naming for new campaigns and create a one-page exception log for legacy campaign data |
なぜ機能するのか
- Evidence is concrete.
- The score is honest.
- The gap explains why AI output would fail.
- Ownership is specific.
- The next fix is narrow enough to complete.
汎用AIが見落としがちな点をProvaがレビューします
- Whether readiness scores are backed by evidence
- Whether "we have dashboards" is being mistaken for usable operating data
- Whether gaps are prerequisites or nice-to-haves
- Whether the team is ready for a pilot or needs foundation repair first
- Whether the next sprint should be workflow audit, measurement architecture, rollout planning, or diagnostic repair
次のステップ
自分の案にフィードバックが欲しい場合、Provaは短いassessmentから始まります。あなたの役割、目標、最初の相手に合わせてレビュー基準を揃え、その後いまの作業に合うsprintへ進みます。
Provaは現在、英語のみ対応しています。
送信前に、クライアント名、機密数値、チームがtrainingやcoaching systemに保存したくない情報を削除してください。
英語版Provaへ進む