Artefak Prova
AI Builder Reality Check untuk Marketers
Tentukan apakah Anda siap membangun potongan produk AI pertama yang benar-benar berguna, dan apa yang paling mungkin rusak jika mulai sekarang.
Paling cocok untukMarketers yang memakai Claude Code, Codex, v0, Replit, atau tool serupa tetapi belum konsisten ship · Operators dengan prototype tetapi belum ada jalur user yang nyata · Senior marketers yang memilih antara tetap menjadi AI power user atau mulai menjadi builder · Consultants yang mengubah domain knowledge menjadi produk kecil atau internal tool
Kolom template
- User and painful job
- First useful slice
- Proof that someone wants it
- Current artifact or prototype
- Weakest assumption
- Data or workflow dependency
- Review standard
- Launch risk
- Next 14-day build commitment
Contoh terisi
A marketer trying to build an internal campaign QA assistant.
Contoh yang sudah terisi di bawah ini tetap memakai bahasa Inggris karena Prova meninjau artifact yang dikirim dalam bahasa Inggris.
Versi lemah vs versi kuat
Versi lemah
- User
- Marketing team
- First useful slice
- AI assistant for campaign QA
- Proof
- Everyone says QA is annoying
- Weakest assumption
- Need better prompts
- Launch risk
- Bugs
- 14-day commitment
- Build MVP
| User | Marketing team |
|---|---|
| First useful slice | AI assistant for campaign QA |
| Proof | Everyone says QA is annoying |
| Weakest assumption | Need better prompts |
| Launch risk | Bugs |
| 14-day commitment | Build MVP |
Mengapa gagal
- "Marketing team" is not a user.
- "AI assistant" is too broad.
- The proof is hearsay, not behavior.
- The weakest assumption ignores source data, approval rules, and workflow ownership.
- "Build MVP" is not a commitment.
Versi kuat
- User
- Paid media manager checking campaign launch settings before client approval
- First useful slice
- A checklist reviewer that compares campaign setup notes against required client launch rules
- Proof
- Two managers already use a manual spreadsheet before every launch; mistakes still reach strategist review
- Current artifact
- One sample launch checklist, three anonymized campaign setup notes, and one failed QA example
- Weakest assumption
- The checklist rules are explicit enough for AI to evaluate without platform access
- Data/workflow dependency
- Client launch rules, platform screenshots, naming conventions, approval owner
- Review standard
- Flag missing budget, geo, naming, tracking, claim, and approval evidence; never approve launch automatically
- Launch risk
- False confidence before a client-visible campaign goes live
- 14-day commitment
- Build a reviewer for one client and one platform, then test against five past launch packets
| User | Paid media manager checking campaign launch settings before client approval |
|---|---|
| First useful slice | A checklist reviewer that compares campaign setup notes against required client launch rules |
| Proof | Two managers already use a manual spreadsheet before every launch; mistakes still reach strategist review |
| Current artifact | One sample launch checklist, three anonymized campaign setup notes, and one failed QA example |
| Weakest assumption | The checklist rules are explicit enough for AI to evaluate without platform access |
| Data/workflow dependency | Client launch rules, platform screenshots, naming conventions, approval owner |
| Review standard | Flag missing budget, geo, naming, tracking, claim, and approval evidence; never approve launch automatically |
| Launch risk | False confidence before a client-visible campaign goes live |
| 14-day commitment | Build a reviewer for one client and one platform, then test against five past launch packets |
Mengapa berhasil
- The user is specific.
- The first slice is constrained.
- Proof comes from an existing workflow.
- Launch risk is clear.
- The commitment creates evidence, not just more code.
Hal yang ditinjau Prova dan sering dilewatkan AI generik
- Whether the first useful slice is still too large
- Whether the user is real or imagined
- Whether there is proof beyond personal excitement
- Whether the artifact standard exists before the build starts
- Whether the hard part is product judgment, data access, approval, or implementation
- Whether the next step should be reality check, build brief, build plan, execution lane, or launch gate
Langkah berikutnya
Butuh feedback atas versimu? Prova mulai dengan assessment singkat agar standar review sesuai dengan peran, tujuan, dan audiens pertamamu. Setelah itu kamu masuk ke sprint yang cocok dengan pekerjaanmu sekarang.
Prova saat ini hanya tersedia dalam bahasa Inggris.
Sebelum mengirim: hapus nama klien, angka rahasia, dan hal apa pun yang tidak boleh tersimpan di sistem training atau coaching.
Lanjut ke Prova dalam bahasa Inggris