Artefak Prova
Template Audit Workflow AI untuk Tim Marketing
Petakan satu workflow marketing dan tentukan bagian mana yang sebaiknya diotomatisasi, dibantu, dilindungi, atau ditolak oleh AI sebelum tim berkomitmen pada pilot.
Kolom template
- Workflow stage
- What AI handles today
- What AI should handle in six months
- What stays human and why
- Ethical or operational risk: low, medium, high
- Action: automate, augment, protect, decline
- ICE score for pilot candidates
Contoh terisi
Contoh yang sudah terisi di bawah ini tetap memakai bahasa Inggris karena Prova meninjau artifact yang dikirim dalam bahasa Inggris.
Client reporting workflow for a paid media account.
Versi lemah vs versi kuat
Versi lemah
| Workflow stage | Reporting |
|---|---|
| AI handles today | AI writes reports |
| Stays human | Strategy |
| Risk | Medium |
| Action | Automate |
Mengapa gagal
- "Reporting" is too broad to audit.
- "Strategy" does not name the judgment point.
- It does not identify source systems, reconciliation risk, or who approves the client-facing narrative.
- Automating the whole workflow is unsafe because the work includes interpretation and client trust.
Versi kuat
| Workflow stage | Weekly paid media variance explanation for Meta, Google, and LinkedIn |
|---|---|
| AI handles today | Drafts first-pass variance notes from exported spend, revenue, CPA, and campaign-change logs |
| AI should handle in six months | Flags likely causes, drafts three audience-specific summaries, and proposes follow-up checks |
| Stays human | Strategist approves causal claims and client recommendation because platform data can be delayed or misleading |
| Risk | High for client narrative, medium for internal diagnosis |
| Action | Augment, with protected human approval before client send |
Mengapa berhasil
- The stage is specific.
- Source systems are named.
- The human judgment point is explicit.
- Risk differs by use case.
- The action is narrow enough to pilot.
Hal yang ditinjau Prova dan sering dilewatkan AI generik
- Whether the workflow scope is specific enough to audit
- Whether "stays human" reasons are concrete or just polite language
- Whether high-risk stages are incorrectly classified as automate
- Whether ICE scores are supported by operational reality
- Whether the selected pilot is narrow enough to test
- Whether the next sprint should be measurement, rollout, or foundation repair
Langkah berikutnya
Butuh feedback atas versimu? Prova mulai dengan assessment singkat agar standar review sesuai dengan peran, tujuan, dan audiens pertamamu. Setelah itu kamu masuk ke sprint yang cocok dengan pekerjaanmu sekarang.
Prova saat ini hanya tersedia dalam bahasa Inggris.
Sebelum mengirim: hapus nama klien, angka rahasia, dan hal apa pun yang tidak boleh tersimpan di sistem training atau coaching.
Lanjut ke Prova dalam bahasa Inggris