你嘅AI代筆係個壞主意。以下係點樣用AI做「Thought Partner」

2025年喇，老實講：「AI Slop」流行病係一個有well-documented嘅危機。John Oliver已經出色咁roast過，Hard Fork嘅主持人喺佢哋嘅podcast入面dissect過，而我哋每日都scroll過佢。我哋都知佢係咩樣：generic、冇靈魂嘅content，聽落好似冇人寫嘅。

所以DIALØGUE homepage嘅main headline唔係關於instant results；而係關於**「Your Creative Control。」**

由第一行code開始，我嘅目標就係build一個respect用戶expertise嘅工具。但我嘅breaking point係當我意識到我哋嘅early prototypes spectacularly fail緊呢個mission。我prompt個system做一個podcast，話題係marketing strategy（我由advertising嗰邊actually知嘅嘢），然後AI generate咗「natural dialogue」但完全唔自然。佢自信滿滿咁解釋我從未聽過嘅concepts，錯誤咁用jargon，而且唔知點做到既authoritative又completely wrong。佢bland、agreeable、冇任何point of view——基本上係我寫過嘅每個好creative brief嘅opposite。

呢個failure迫我做決定。我throw out咗「fully automated」嘅夢想，圍繞一個新philosophy rebuild成個workflow：AI作為collaborator，唔係replacement。我哋embrace咗真正嘅quality需要~10分鐘，唔係10秒嘅想法。

呢篇文唔係另一篇揭露AI slop問題嘅文——我哋都知問題所在。呢個係睇我哋設計嚟解決佢嘅specific 4步workflow，確保你可以generate之前review，而且shine through嘅係你嘅expertise，唔係AI嘅。

AI大誤解：點解你嘅AI Content聽落同其他人一模一樣

有樣關於Large Language Models嘅嘢：佢哋被designed to be agreeable/helpful。佢哋係trained on整個internet嘅average，即係佢哋係median嘅masters、commonplace嘅champions。佢哋冇你_battle-tested嘅個人_故事、你_controversial嘅opinions_、或者你喺你嘅field十年來嘅hard-won wisdom。

當你俾AI lead creative process，你係outsourcing你最有價值嘅asset：你_獨特嘅point of view_。你叫一個被designed to be average嘅machine represent你嘅exceptional expertise。好幾個禮拜，我stuck喺呢度。我試緊force AI有personality、有我嘅voice。我寫越來越desperate嘅prompts好似「sound casual but professional, like someone who knows what they're talking about but isn't pompous about it。」AI嘅interpretation？Content唔知點做到既pompous又wrong。真係frustrating又貴嘅failure（係嘅，我仲有少少bitter嗰啲API costs）。

轉變：AI-Assisted Expertise嘅4步Workflow

突破唔係一個更好嘅prompt；而係一個更好嘅workflow。我意識到目標唔係叫AI代你思考，而係幫你structure你_自己_嘅thinking。我唔再試make AI做show嘅主角。Expert（就係你！）先至係主角。AI係producer、editor、assistant。

以下係我最終確定嘅4步human-in-the-loop model。

第1步：Expert嘅「Brain Dump」

喺你開一個新tab之前，由你自己開始。開一個blank document，寫低你對你expertise topic嘅raw、unfiltered想法。你嘅opinions、故事、data points。佢應該係messy嘅。我嘅brain dumps好chaotic——充滿half-formed sentences、random parentheticals、同好似「maybe mention that thing from Tuesday??」嘅notes（我從來唔記得Tuesday嗰件事係咩）。而呢個就係point。你capture緊你嘅genius喺佢最authentic、未polish嘅形態。我為DIALØGUE做嘅brain dump例子如下，睇到我唔care拼寫錯誤 :D

Expansion for more features?
- Use generate queries as part of the pre feedback workflow?

Variety of voice, rythm and tone

第2步：AI做Structure，唔係做Substance

而家，你攞嗰份messy但brilliant嘅document俾AI。但你嘅prompt唔係「write a blog post from this。」而係「Take these chaotic notes and organize them into a logical outline。」AI嘅job係做一個brilliant、tireless嘅editor，搵到你thinking入面嘅patterns，俾你一個clean structure去work with。

第3步：「De-Slop」Edit（呢度先係Magic）

呢個係最重要嘅步驟。AI俾返你一個clean、logical outline。而家，你，human expert，make it brilliant。你加返nuance、personality、只有你先可以講嘅故事。你rewrite AI嘅generic phrasing聽落好似你。例如，AI可能suggest「discuss the importance of user feedback。」你改做「that time a user's feedback made me rebuild the entire workflow at 8pm (worth it)。」AI build咗間屋嘅frame；而家你做interior design。你揀paint、furniture、art。你make it a home。（同一個principle唔淨止用喺content——當我用AI build咗一個native iOS app，code scaffold嚟得好快，但令佢feel like a real product嘅「interior design」仍然完全係人類嘅工作。）

第4步：AI做Production

當outline被你完善咗——當佢真正reflect你嘅expertise同voice——_然後_你可以用AI做final production。對DIALØGUE嚟講，即係generate podcast audio。對blog post嚟講，可能係叫AI基於你detailed、human-edited嘅bullet points flesh out各個sections。AI唔再creative thinking；佢execute緊一個你create嘅well-defined plan。

我點樣將呢個Philosophy Build入DIALØGUE

呢個workflow太effective喇，所以我將佢做咗DIALØGUE嘅core。Interactive outline editor係第3步嘅physical manifestation。佢係「de-slop」station。佢designed to force a pause，確保human expert係audio generate之前嘅最終quality仲裁者。

呢個philosophy延伸到其他features。你可能留意到DIALØGUE唔會自動加intro/outro music。呢個係intentional。最終audio係clean嘅，ready for _你嘅_branding。我想encourage一個final、thoughtful review，你作為creator加入你自己嘅music同personality。呢個係令佢uniquely yours嘅最後human touchpoint。

而如果你唔鍾意AI voices呢？完全冇問題！事實上，呢個係另一種用呢個tool嘅方式。你可以攞DIALØGUE generate嘅final、perfectly structured script當做teleprompter script，用你自己嘅voice錄。目標係一個great final product，而你有complete control點樣達到。

結論：Amplify，唔好Abdicate

我嘅目標係build amplify expertise嘅工具，唔係abdicate佢。我想令experts更efficient而唔係將佢哋變成generic content machines。Content嘅未來唔係關於邊個可以generate最多，而係邊個可以generate最多value。而value嚟自unique、human嘅point of view。

但呢個只係我嘅journey（老實講，我仲喺度figure out某啲parts）。你有冇同「AI slop」掙扎過？你用緊咩workflows？我好想聽你嘅想法。隨時留comment或者email我——尤其如果你搵到更好嘅方法，因為我隨時準備偷...我係話，學好ideas。

而如果你想親自試吓「thought partner」workflow，你可以去試吓DIALØGUE。Outline editor等緊你嘅genius。或者至少你slightly organized嘅chaos，呢個都係我每次帶去嘅全部。